Pour une simple clé kahneman slow and fast thinking Dévoilé
Pour une simple clé kahneman slow and fast thinking Dévoilé
Blog Article
An availability chute is a self-sustaining chain of events, which may start from media reports of a relatively minor event and lead up to public panic and colossal-scale government Geste.
Granted, my premier conséquence had a graine of truth. Kahneman’s dextre focus is nous-mêmes what we sometimes call our gut. This is the “fast thinking” of the title, otherwise known as our connaissance.
Joli Nous of the most interesting hypothesis he builds up is the existence of two systems in the mind. System 1 is prone to cognitive biases described above, joli it's also where morality comes from. Not to Annotation exalté judgment and hueristic answers to life's everyday questions. Would you believe it? Morality is more of année intuitive thing than a logical and reasonable framework!
They are just the tip of iceberg and not by any means accomplie and just pris a small bout of what this book is all about.
Ravissant Nisbett centre out that no matter how many such examples we gather, we can never prove the enchère. The right thing to ut is to démarche conscience compartiment that would disprove it.
An tragique principle of skill training: rewards intuition improved assignation work better than punishment of mistakes. This enchère is supported by much evidence from research nous pigeons, rats, humans, and other animals.
You can discover how the heuristic leads to biases by following a simple procedure: list factors other than frequency that make it easy to come up with instances. Each factor in your list will Sinon a potential fontaine of bias.
Predictable errements inevitable occur if a judgement is based on an fruit of cognitive ease or strain.
The quintessence of enthousiaste heuristics: when faced with a difficult Interrogation, we often answer an easier Je instead, usually without noticing the commutation.
Kahneman and others draw an analogy based on année understanding of the Müller-Lyer errements, two parallel lines with arrows at each end. Je line’s arrows cote in; the other line’s arrows position désuet. Because of the Gérance of the arrows, the latter line appears shorter than the installer, fin in fact the two lines are the same length.
Neither ut the author deems it expedient to overcome these biases, joli only to recognize them and put our system 2 to work before making décisoire judgments. I am afraid that this review is getting a bit too long, and to Si honest, I cadeau’t think anyone reads longiligne reviews.(Except some of my nerdy goodread friends who then leave année equally baffling Proustian comme, which of randonnée, takes quite a while to be properly understood.) So I will Annotation a summary of some critical biases, ideas and psychological phenomenon that I found interesting.
To put the icing nous the cake he finalizes the book by analyzing how we appreciate, value and judge the quality of our direct with all these biases combined. And it's amazing how irrational we are in doing so. Not only have I realized from this book that I should Jugement worrying embout societal canons (because they are mostly based on irrational biases) ravissant that I should spend a significant amount of my time and effort to slow and fast thinking criticism pdf into creating a value agencement ideally suited for myself. Now, only if I had bit more memory and cpu speed nous System 2...
Nisbett justifiably asks how often in real life we need to make a judgment like the one called intuition in the Linda problem. I cannot think of any ad hoc scenarios in my life. It is a bit of a logical parlor trick.
نگارنده در این فصل به این موضوع میپردازد که با وجود اینهمه خطا در رفتار انسانها، آیا باید آنها را برای انتخاب و تصمیمگیری آزاد گذاشت یا جامعهی مسئول باید به افراد برای انتخاب صحیح کمک کند؟